Lab Grown Skin

May be beneficial after animal testing ban

Scientists in the United States are growing human skin from the leftovers of cosmetic operations using living epidermis known as Episkin, which is used in tiny samples to test cosmetics. This technology avoids the need to use animals, which will prove significant because from next year, the EU Cosmetics Directive will ban the use of animals in testing cosmetics and their ingredients.

Lab Grown SkinLab Grown SkinL’Oreal, the cosmetic company who runs the lab, secured a breakthrough last May when Episkin, which has taken more than 20 years and £500 million (about RM3.2 billion) to develop, was awarded validation by the European Commission regulator as an official alternative to animal testing for skin irritancy.

The development of artificial human skin will not mean the end of animal tests because they are still required by law in industries such as food, pesticides and pharmaceuticals. But the European Commission has estimated that Episkin could save about 20,000 animals a year from laboratory testing.

Source: 
Times Online, February 23, 2008
INDEMNITY: While every care has been taken to ensure accuracy of information in this website, the publisher takes no responsibility for any circumstances whatsoever arising out of any errors, omissions or misrepresentations herein. Though medical experts are consulted in the articles appearing in this website, the information in this website should in no way be construed as medical advice. Please check with your doctor before undergoing any medical aesthetic procedure.All Rights Reserved. © Copyrights 2003 - 2009. No part of this publication may be reproduced whether by photocopying, recording, translation into other languages or any means whatsoever without the prior written permission of the publisher. While freelance contributions are welcome, acceptance of material is not guaranteed. Manuscripts and photographs should be accompanied by stamped, self-addressed envelopes. The company accepts no responsibility for loss of damage to material submitted. Opinions expressed in COSMETIC SURGERY & BEAUTY are not necessarily those of the publisher.